Mary Harron’s 2000 film “American Psycho” isn’t a horror movie. Not really. But it does feature an axe murder, and a crazed lunatic running around an apartment complex naked, operating a chainsaw, so it can definitely be filed under horror, piled on top of social satire. The film, starring then-relative newcomer Christian Bale, is a period piece, a criticism of ‘80s yuppie greed, and a man’s supposed bloodlust born from severe ennui. It’s also based on the novel, a cult classic by Brett Easton Ellis (“Rules of Attraction”), albeit a more toned down version. Had it stuck to his novel, the film would easily have had to have been rated NC-17.

“American Psycho” follows the exploits of Patrick Bateman (Bale), a 27-year-old multi-millionaire who works in Mergers and Acquisitions. The film paints the laid back, materialistic, entitled lives these mean lead. Its opening portrays emotionless waiters informing guests of specials, daintily dressed women eating rich deserts with white gloves, and a group of Wall Street types reveling in the relative low cost of tonight’s meal. “Only $570,” one utters.

no girls with good personalities

What the film does is to submerse viewers in its ‘80s subculture and rich, upscale life with seamless ease. Tape decks blare Robert Palmer’s “Simply Irresistible,” its wealthy elite dance to INXS in trendy nightclubs, discussing topics ranging from the AIDS epidemic to Glastnost. Bateman and his entourage are all obsessed with the latest fashions, such as Brooks Brothers suits, Oliver People’s glasses, and envy each other with passive-aggressive spite should one dress better, or god forbid have a better haircut than the other. The best instance of this shines as Bateman pensively monologues an agonizing torture over his friend Bryce preferring another’s business card to his.

The film’s cinematography is pristine and clean, shot by Andrzej Sekula, responsible for other crime stories such as “Pulp Fiction” and “Reservoir Dogs.” Everything in the film, from its characters apartments, to their offices, to their look and countenance is crisp and bright. And the filming style is unique, using Bateman as narrator to the wealthy yet boring life these people lead, his only escape his pathological fantasies and murderous escapades that line the film’s run-time. Sekula’s attention to detail is precise, casting bright rays of light upon the film’s days, and dark, somber notes on the film’s nights. And while the film’s most horrifying sequence involves Bateman’s supposed murder of a fellow colleague, his incessant lecturing on the greatness of artist Phil Collins’ career, while donning a white, see-through rain slicker and grabbing a glistening silver axe causes a degree of separation from the material that follows.

The acting in the film is, for the most part, excellent. I read that early versions of “American Psycho” were supposed to cast Leonardo DiCaprio as Patrick Bateman. But I really can’t see the film working with another actor other than Bale, who has shown method acting in films such as the disturbing “Harsh Times.” He takes Bateman and runs with him, painting not a man who gets off on his killing, but a man who turns to it for relief from his unfulfilling life only to realize it offers him no escape. Bale infuses Bateman with some of the more sinister qualities from the book, without that novel’s overly graphic and disturbing sequences as fodder to do so. “I’m utterly insane. Did you know that I like to dissect girls?” he asks of a colleague, who doesn’t respond. It’s in this way the film makes you question reality, even whether the film’s violence is actually carried out, or merely exists in its antagonist’s head as a what if? to his lifeless existence.

Other actors, such as Chloë Sevigny, who plays Bateman’s secretary, and Josh Lucas, who plays fellow Wall Streeter Craig McDermott add to the film as needed. Justin Theroux, who plays Timothy Bryce, is probably the most capable aside Bale. Whether purposeful or not, as Bryce was the most compelling character aside Bateman in the novel, remains to be seen. And we even have the dynamic Willem Dafoe who makes an appearance as a police detective who investigates one of Bateman’s murders. None of the characters steal the show, but add to an engrossing portrayal that Director Mary Harron tries hard not to veer from. If Easton Ellis’ novel was about murder and lust, this film becomes instead about greed, avarice, and the dangers of waltzing through life in resigned misery.

“American Psycho” is a solid effort, not a perfect film, but one that attempts to comment on society in a clever way while disguised as a period piece. An ‘80s soundtrack dates it, but doesn’t quite cause the film to wash over you as much as an original score might have. Competent acting and direction propel it along, even if the ending leaves more to the imagination than audiences may have liked. While not an out-and-out horror or slasher film, some sequences will doubtless scare audiences, while at the same time providing food for thought on the motives, and life, of its elusive antagonist.

– by Mark Ziobro

Share.

Mark is a New York based film critic and founder and Managing Editor of The Movie Buff. He has contributed film reviews to websites such as Movie-Blogger and Filmotomy, as well as local, independent print news medium. He is a lifelong lover of cinema, his favorite genres being drama, horror, and independent. Follow Mark @The_Movie_Buff on Twitter for all site news.

Leave A Reply

Currently you have JavaScript disabled. In order to post comments, please make sure JavaScript and Cookies are enabled, and reload the page. Click here for instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Exit mobile version