Yes the doll itself is hideous, in a way that easily surpasses the legendary Chucky and rivals the creep-factor of “Annabelle.” But unlike the aforementioned film, the 2015 movie “Robert” has no plot or enjoyment factor whatsoever.
I’ve been a student of the real life Robert the doll story, so a movie loosely based on these events was something that picked my interest. But a host of terrible kiddish music, sloppy editing, and potentially the worst acting in the history of movies makes the story boring and nearly unwatchable.
When Jenny Otto (Suzie Frances Garton) fires her aging babysitter Agatha, the elder woman gets her revenge on the family by delivering the Robert doll to the son Gene as as gift. “Now that I wont be here you’ll need a new friend” Agatha advises as she deposits the wretched looking doll.
Gene replies as any teen boy would when handed a sinister looking and unaesthetic toy to keep in his room. “Dolls are for girls.” Really? That’s what Writer/Director Andrew Jones chooses for him to say? I would have preferred “WTF is that thing get it out of here! But I guess that would have ended the movie early (which in hindsight would have been the better option for all of us).
But then Andrew Jones (whose IMDB bio lists a score of terrible horror movies) continues to go back to it over and over. I thought the scene with babysitter Martha (Megan Lockhurst) was the highlight of the movie and its only a few minutes in length.
Dolls have been and always will be spooky. But “Robert” is proof that the creep factor of the doll itself isn’t enough. It needs to be included in a story that’s decent at the very least. Check out “Annabelle” or “The Conjuring” for much better scary doll options.
1 Comment
Sorry…I strongly disagree with you on your view of “Robert.” The first I saw it, I couldn’t move. It dragged me into the movie and would NOT let go!!! I watched it again later in the evening. I am a huge horror/slaher fan/ THIS FIRST MOVIE IS AWESOME BECAUSE IT IS REAL!!! I have two copies; one is still sealed.